<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Online Are You?  A Writer&#8217;s Scale of Internet Engagement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/</link>
	<description>The Official Website</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:41:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: BookWhirl.com</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>BookWhirl.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-93</guid>
		<description>The most important thing i&#039;ve learned on your post is to properly manage time according to priorities. I must say that this is a really helpful, especially to writers who are having a difficult time in juggling with their career. Five stars for this post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most important thing i&#8217;ve learned on your post is to properly manage time according to priorities. I must say that this is a really helpful, especially to writers who are having a difficult time in juggling with their career. Five stars for this post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Celia Yeary</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia Yeary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:01:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-91</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, makes one stop and think. I am a solid five. But in using your percentage chart, I am, as you say, &quot;out of whack.&quot; WAY out of whack. I&#039;m a social being, and while I love to write, too, I love interacting more. I like your article--very good. Celia</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, makes one stop and think. I am a solid five. But in using your percentage chart, I am, as you say, &#8220;out of whack.&#8221; WAY out of whack. I&#8217;m a social being, and while I love to write, too, I love interacting more. I like your article&#8211;very good. Celia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James A, Ritchie</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-90</link>
		<dc:creator>James A, Ritchie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-90</guid>
		<description>Very interesting.  I&#039;m s full-time writer, but my online prsence is pretty minimal. No twitter, no facebook, a bit on two forums and a blog I update infrequently.

For me, the internet is primarily for research, for business e-mail, and for submissions.

I did a rough chart, and I write thirty hours per six day week, read twenty-five hours per seven day week, spend five hours on fourums, about ten hours researching, and about three dealing with e-mail.  

I&#039;m not big on editors Googling my name.  I really don&#039;t think this is much of a factor at all.  The editors I work with only worry about a bad web presence, not a lack thereof.  Web presence gets real easy when the publisher buys your book, and they&#039;ll handle most of it for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting.  I&#8217;m s full-time writer, but my online prsence is pretty minimal. No twitter, no facebook, a bit on two forums and a blog I update infrequently.</p>
<p>For me, the internet is primarily for research, for business e-mail, and for submissions.</p>
<p>I did a rough chart, and I write thirty hours per six day week, read twenty-five hours per seven day week, spend five hours on fourums, about ten hours researching, and about three dealing with e-mail.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not big on editors Googling my name.  I really don&#8217;t think this is much of a factor at all.  The editors I work with only worry about a bad web presence, not a lack thereof.  Web presence gets real easy when the publisher buys your book, and they&#8217;ll handle most of it for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad R. Torgersen</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad R. Torgersen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-89</guid>
		<description>Interesting post.

I&#039;m afraid to admit that my weekly percentages are decidedly &lt;em&gt;un&lt;/em&gt;professional right now.  Too much surfing, not enough reading for pleasure, and never enough time spent on the actual writing itself.

Oh, and video games.  I don&#039;t play them much, but when I let myself, I tend to go in all the way.  As in, kiss the hours goodbye!  Spent the last two days home sick from work, in fact, and the time I should have spent writing was spent instead on Mechwarrior 4.  It&#039;s an old game, but Lord, I&#039;m always a sucker for that franchise.

I do think it&#039;s worth noting that some people -- like Scalzi -- are a curious hybrid of fiction writter and blog mogul.  In fact, one might argue that Scalzi is a blogger first and foremost, who broke into fiction writing a few years ago.  Now Scalzi&#039;s fiction and his blog sort of feed off of each other, with his name recognition having gone through the roof -- at least in geek circles.

You could also point to someone like Larry Correia, who had enough of an on-line pressence to get his self-published novel onto the radar of enough readers that Baen eventually picked him up, and now that same novel is going gangbusters, Larry has more novels on the way, etc.

I think the key for Scalzi and Correia both is that their on-line activity is &lt;em&gt;invested&lt;/em&gt; on-line activity.  I suspect too many people -- not just writers, all kinds of businesses -- think that it&#039;s enough to toss up a placeholder web page and blog, jot off the occasional missive, then sit back and call it good.  Correia and Scalzi are big-time, active participants in their particular corners of the InterToob, and it&#039;s this activity which continues to generate traffic for their pages and -- one reasons -- sales for their fiction.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m afraid to admit that my weekly percentages are decidedly <em>un</em>professional right now.  Too much surfing, not enough reading for pleasure, and never enough time spent on the actual writing itself.</p>
<p>Oh, and video games.  I don&#8217;t play them much, but when I let myself, I tend to go in all the way.  As in, kiss the hours goodbye!  Spent the last two days home sick from work, in fact, and the time I should have spent writing was spent instead on Mechwarrior 4.  It&#8217;s an old game, but Lord, I&#8217;m always a sucker for that franchise.</p>
<p>I do think it&#8217;s worth noting that some people &#8212; like Scalzi &#8212; are a curious hybrid of fiction writter and blog mogul.  In fact, one might argue that Scalzi is a blogger first and foremost, who broke into fiction writing a few years ago.  Now Scalzi&#8217;s fiction and his blog sort of feed off of each other, with his name recognition having gone through the roof &#8212; at least in geek circles.</p>
<p>You could also point to someone like Larry Correia, who had enough of an on-line pressence to get his self-published novel onto the radar of enough readers that Baen eventually picked him up, and now that same novel is going gangbusters, Larry has more novels on the way, etc.</p>
<p>I think the key for Scalzi and Correia both is that their on-line activity is <em>invested</em> on-line activity.  I suspect too many people &#8212; not just writers, all kinds of businesses &#8212; think that it&#8217;s enough to toss up a placeholder web page and blog, jot off the occasional missive, then sit back and call it good.  Correia and Scalzi are big-time, active participants in their particular corners of the InterToob, and it&#8217;s this activity which continues to generate traffic for their pages and &#8212; one reasons &#8212; sales for their fiction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Hendrickson</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hendrickson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-88</guid>
		<description>Another great post, Scott!

This gives me another kick in the butt to get my website built.  I have the domain name but needed to get past this semester and/or complete my current novel before I felt I had the time to devote to a website.

However, your note about an editor Googling struck home for me since I have another novel that I&#039;m actively marketing.  An editor might see lots of my nonfiction but the lack of a website would be a strike against me.

Time to find the time to get the website up and runnning.

Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post, Scott!</p>
<p>This gives me another kick in the butt to get my website built.  I have the domain name but needed to get past this semester and/or complete my current novel before I felt I had the time to devote to a website.</p>
<p>However, your note about an editor Googling struck home for me since I have another novel that I&#8217;m actively marketing.  An editor might see lots of my nonfiction but the lack of a website would be a strike against me.</p>
<p>Time to find the time to get the website up and runnning.</p>
<p>Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Vukcevich</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Vukcevich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Great post, Scott.  Fun charts!
Must find time to get my site up to speed! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, Scott.  Fun charts!<br />
Must find time to get my site up to speed! <img src='http://scottwilliamcarter.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Donna:  Probably both, but definitely have a site under your pen name.  The idea is to promote your &quot;brand.&quot;  It&#039;s also a question of how secret you want your real identity to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donna:  Probably both, but definitely have a site under your pen name.  The idea is to promote your &#8220;brand.&#8221;  It&#8217;s also a question of how secret you want your real identity to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donna Caubarreaux</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Caubarreaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-85</guid>
		<description>Great idea on promoting yourself.

Question:  Since I won&#039;t be using my &#039;real&#039; name on my books, and am yet unpublished, should I be using my &#039;pen&#039; name?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea on promoting yourself.</p>
<p>Question:  Since I won&#8217;t be using my &#8216;real&#8217; name on my books, and am yet unpublished, should I be using my &#8216;pen&#8217; name?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alma Alexander</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Alma Alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I easily hit 5 - and then I miss out on 6 (I don&#039;t Twitter, that&#039;s the one thing I positively WILL NOT do) and 7 (so far no podcasting and no trailers) and I plough straight into 8 and 9. The only reason I am not a 10 is that I am technoidiot. Else I WOULD have an AI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I easily hit 5 &#8211; and then I miss out on 6 (I don&#8217;t Twitter, that&#8217;s the one thing I positively WILL NOT do) and 7 (so far no podcasting and no trailers) and I plough straight into 8 and 9. The only reason I am not a 10 is that I am technoidiot. Else I WOULD have an AI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Denise Jaden</title>
		<link>http://scottwilliamcarter.com/2009/11/16/how-online-are-you-a-writers-scale-of-internet-engagement/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Denise Jaden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 23:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottwilliamcarter.com/?p=634#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Thanks Scott. This was interesting!

Denise (another fellow Tenner)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Scott. This was interesting!</p>
<p>Denise (another fellow Tenner)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

